These 30 scenarios assume facts to explain rule boundaries. They are not real passenger reviews or payment evidence.
Directory entries
Flight Claim Scenario 001: Korean Domestic Delay of 90 MinutesA fare-percentage calculation is illustrative only until the current Korean annex, fare base and carrier responsibility are verified.Flight Claim Scenario 002: Korean Domestic Delay at Exactly 120 MinutesA boundary value needs the exact wording of the current rule. Do not automatically select a higher or lower band.Flight Claim Scenario 003: EU Long-Haul Arrival Delay of Four HoursA €600 reference can be relevant only if EU261 scope, distance, arrival time and exemptions all support it.Flight Claim Scenario 004: Korea to EU on a Non-EU Operating CarrierThe destination alone does not bring this inbound flight under EU261. Check the actual operating carrier.Flight Claim Scenario 005: EU Flight at 1,000 Kilometers and 180 MinutesThe time and distance are assumed inputs. They do not establish an actual payment without the other legal conditions.Flight Claim Scenario 006: Departure 200 Minutes Late, Arrival 140 Minutes LateDeparture care and fixed arrival-delay compensation use different clocks.Flight Claim Scenario 007: EU Weather Cancellation With Overnight RebookingAn extraordinary-circumstances defense can affect fixed compensation while care still needs a separate review.Flight Claim Scenario 008: UK Long-Haul Arrival Delay of Three and a Half HoursA reduced long-haul amount can be relevant under UK rules; full eligibility still depends on the facts.Flight Claim Scenario 009: US Cancellation With Rebooking DeclinedA traveler who does not accept an alternative may have a refund path under US DOT rules.Flight Claim Scenario 010: US Domestic Flight Moved Three Hours EarlierA large early departure can be a significant change, but the traveler’s acceptance matters.Flight Claim Scenario 011: US International Arrival Six Hours Late After TravelA traveler who took the changed flight is in a different refund situation from one who declined it.Flight Claim Scenario 012: Canada Large Carrier With Three-Hour Arrival DelayCheck the carrier-control category and notice conditions before using a compensation amount.Flight Claim Scenario 013: Canada Small Carrier With Six-Hour Arrival DelaySmall-airline APPR reference amounts differ from large-airline amounts.Flight Claim Scenario 014: Canada Delay Required for SafetyA safety-related disruption has a different APPR compensation analysis from an ordinary controllable delay.Flight Claim Scenario 015: EU Cancellation Notice Given Fifteen Days AheadEarly notice can affect fixed compensation without erasing the refund or rerouting choice.Flight Claim Scenario 016: EU Cancellation Thirty-Six Hours Before DepartureCheck the replacement flight’s exact timing and the cancellation reason, not just the notice window.Flight Claim Scenario 017: Missed Flight on a Separate Self-Transfer TicketThe second ticket may not be protected as part of the first airline’s itinerary.Flight Claim Scenario 018: Protected Connection With Four-Hour Final DelayThe final destination and single-ticket structure can matter more than the first leg’s shorter delay.Flight Claim Scenario 019: Refund and Separate Compensation Considered TogetherA ticket refund and a statutory payment answer different questions. Neither should be assumed to cancel the other automatically.Flight Claim Scenario 020: Proven Loss of €120 and a 6,303 SDR CeilingA treaty liability ceiling is not the payment amount; documented loss remains central.Flight Claim Scenario 021: ANA Expense Portal Without an Airline InvitationAn official expense portal can have access and timing conditions. Finding its URL does not prove eligibility.Flight Claim Scenario 022: Delta Expense Form Used by a Korean ResidentA regional form may not accept every resident. Check the form’s stated eligibility and alternate support path.Flight Claim Scenario 023: Official Case With Conflicting Award ArithmeticWhen the published order and calculation disagree, do not invent a normalized payment figure.Flight Claim Scenario 024: Brazil Flight on October 31, 2026A 2026 rule change requires an effective-date check before using an assistance or compensation threshold.Flight Claim Scenario 025: Credit Card Trip Delay Coverage Appears MetA delay threshold alone does not prove insurance coverage; payment method, exclusions and receipts matter.Flight Claim Scenario 026: Voluntary Seat Surrender After US OverbookingA negotiated voucher or cash agreement differs from involuntary denied boarding.Flight Claim Scenario 027: India Cancellation: Flight Time vs Delay TimeDo not confuse scheduled flight duration with the delay measure in a compensation rule.Flight Claim Scenario 028: Thailand International Cancellation With Eight-Day NoticeThe notice period matters, but the current CAAT rule and flight category must be checked.Flight Claim Scenario 029: Travel Voucher Worth More Than Cash OfferA higher face value may come with expiration and use limits. Compare the legal cash option first.Flight Claim Scenario 030: Hotel Cost of 100 With 80 Already InsuredTrack the remaining documented loss and any coordination rules; do not claim the same expense twice without disclosure.
This example is hypothetical. It doesn't show what an airline paid a real traveler.